|
|
The Content Monster |
Working with many non-profits who are looking to redesign their websites, I’ve learned how frightening (read: overwhelming, daunting, discouraging) content planning can be. Even when you have a solid new architecture prepared for your site, there’s still the process of identifying:
I posted a few months ago about creating a content strategy, which can help to guide and focus this process but I think most people are confused about where to even begin.
Here’s a good tip – start early. "Early" as in before you even start the redesign process. The good news is that you probably already have a website, so you’re not starting from scratch. Sure, you may want your new site to look COMPLETELY different, but you still likely have language you can use describing your mission, press releases you can use and other content areas you can leverage. That’s why you should start with a content inventory. By reviewing everything you have on your site, you can get a sense of where you’re starting from and also how much you need to do.
If you don’t have a content inventory that you diligently keep up to date (what? you don’t?), there are some tools out there you can use to “crawl” your site to give you a solid list to use. GSiteCrawler is one that we use frequently.
Once you have your inventory, add in a column and start prioritizing content. Anything you know you don’t want on the new site, go ahead and remove. Then, categorize this way:
Then, move the “2” and “3” items into a separate spreadsheet and only focus on your “1” items to see what needs to be finessed, rewritten or overhauled. Starting this process early and with a focused method such as this one will make your content creation much less painful.
Do you have any techniques for content planning that have worked well or other resources to share? What about other questions about content planning? Share with us in the comments!
Subscribe to receive posts via email:
Get answers to product questions, join "Birds of a Feather" discussions and more. Join the Online Community
Alltop - Nonprofit
Beaconfirewire
Beth's Blog
Donor Power Blog
Everyday Giving
Future Leaders in Philanthropy
Frogloop
Getting Attention
Global Voices
Katya's Nonprofit Marketing Blog
Nonprofit Law Prof
NTEN
Sea Change Strategies
Social Actions
Tactical Philanthropy
The Agitator
Walkathon Guide
Zen and the Art of Nonprofit Technology
URL: www.connectioncafe.com
Great comment, Timoluege - you're right on. It's so important to assign ownership in a content inventory. Depending on your organization, this could be one column that designates a person, source or department. It could also be a few fields to designate the workflow process of posting and approving content. See my post on Content Strategy here for more info about preparing content: http://www.connectioncafe.com/posts/2009/april/content-strategy-tips.html
URL: sm4good.com
I totally about the frightening, overwhelming, daunting and scary part. I'm the web editor for ifrc.org - the website for the International Federation of Red Cross and Red Crescent Societies. We are currently in the process of moving to a CMS and redesigning the site and few things give me as much as headache as content migration. Granted, we might be in a particular bad situation since we don't have a CMS yet. That means that our 25,000 web pages exists as static HTML pages that we currently administer with Dreamweaver (not using the templating features). Getting that to the new web site is an absolute nightmare. However, I found that the biggest challenge is not the content inventory or prioritizing it. The biggest problem is a lack of good web governance policies. I think before dealing with the inventory or migration plan you should clarify these questions: Who owns the content? Who has the authority to decide what is appropriate for the web site and what isn't? Do you have written, published guidelines that support your decisions? Since the website is the main communication tool for many programmes it can be very difficult to explain to them that there content simply isn't good enough (anymore) and that it doesn't make it into Category 1. Particularly if, a couple of years ago, they might have paid to to have it produced or translated.