|
|
Cutting through the noise on Capitol Hill |
The Congressional Management Foundation has put out a report on how to improve the state of affairs for communicating electronically with Congress. The report was released on December 8, 2008 (with an interim report published earlier this year in July). I think that everyone who is doing grassroots and online advocacy campaigns should read the full report, so download it today.
Here are some of the take-aways I thought were most notable - some of which reinforce already accepted best practices, and one that was new to me:
Citizens should:
Organizations should:
The "identify the organization behind the grassroots campaign" recommendation made me sit up and take notice. I used to think it was better NOT to identify the organization, and instead to spend a lot of time and effort making it seem like the letter from the constituent had no connection to an organization at all. We used various techniques like rotating subject lines for the letter to Congress, rotating a carousel of letters, and not naming our organization in the text of the letter.
Turns out that's not necessarily a good investment of time. Hill staffers prefer to know which organization is facilitating the communication, as well as an easy way to categorize the organization's and constituents' position on the issue or bill. And I can't say I blame them, knowing that the volume of messages they receive and must reply to is growing every year. (I'm not done with my Christmas cards yet, and it's going to be a race to the finish line this year, so I really feel for them.)
The report also calls for a new model of constituent correspondence management on the Hill. It refers to an aggregated communications dashboard, essentially a tool for managing the volume of incoming corresponence while preserving the ability to read and respond individually to messages. This dashboard would summarize such pertinent data as the issue/bill number, the issue position of the organization (support/oppose with comments) and the constituent comments. CMF's study also recommends identifying the vendor as well as the organization so there is a contact in case technical issues are identified.
In addition to easing the burden of managing constituent correspondence, there's another potential benefit for Congress. Over time, this system would essentially be compiling database of the "poli-fluentials" in a Member's district. See pages 15-16 of the report - poli-fluentials are people who participate in online advocacy, and are 7 times more likely to be "influentials" in their social networks. (If you attended the "Social Media for Social Good" webinar yesterday, you probably learned about influentials and social networks.) There's a lot more to say about poli-fluentials than I can fit in here - maybe a topic for another day.
Anyway, I thought it would be fun to look up some of the older advocacy campaigns that I worked on, and I was pleasantly surprised to see that for the most part, the campaigns I put out in 2001-2006 followed almost all of these best practices (except for the "identify the organization" one). I'm sure some of my lobbyist colleagues had a lot to do with keeping our letters clear and concise, since most of them had been around the congressional block as legislative correspondents or assistants. So thanks, guys!
Anyway - the 111th Congress is just around the corner, so if you haven't read this study, get it today and spend some quality time with it over the holidays.
Subscribe to receive posts via email:
Get answers to product questions, join "Birds of a Feather" discussions and more. Join the Online Community
Alltop - Nonprofit
A Small Change
Beaconfirewire
Beth's Blog
Bob Ottenhoff's Blog
Donor Power Blog
Everyday Giving
Future Leaders in Philanthropy
Frogloop
Getting Attention
Global Voices
Katya's Nonprofit Marketing Blog
Kivi’s Nonprofit Communications Blog
Nonprofit Law Prof
Nonprofit Quarterly
Nonprofit Tech
NTEN
Pamela’s Grant Blog
Sea Change Strategies
Social Actions
Tactical Philanthropy
The Agitator
Walkathon Guide
Wild Apricot
Zen and the Art of Nonprofit Technology