|
|
Don't Take Your Staff's Engagement For Granted |
Once upon a time, I worked as a membership development director for non-profit professional associations in Washington, DC. The core functions of my work centered on new member recruitment and current member retention, both of which were (and still are) incredibly important to organizational health. I always pitched to my staff, executives, and Board of Directors that members are the lifeblood of the association. Without members - who bring their dues, participation, and energetic passion - there would be no association. Common sense, right?
But then, I would follow this with something usually less obvious: without an engaged staff, there would be no members wanting to bring their dues, participation, and energetic passion. Too often, professional associations and non-profits expend so much of their focus on what lies outside, they can overlook the very people who make things happen inside every single day (don't worry, for-profits are not immune either). There's a reason why many non-profits are not run solely by members or volunteers. It's because the professional paid staff have the experience, skills, and talents to help members and volunteers achieve great organizational goals.
If you're in a leadership role for a non-profit, take some time today to think about your staff and whether they're truly engaged in their work. Because non-profits are usually mission-driven, it's easy to take employee engagement for granted. But an engaged staffer who has the ability to use their unique strengths, talents, and passions on a daily basis is far more likely to deliver the kind of remarkable service that attracts new members or constituents and retains them.
Here are a few questions to ask. Start by answering yourself and then pose them to each staff member during your one-on-ones:
Are you able to use your own unique strengths, talents, and passions everyday in your work?
Deeply listen to what is said and learn from what you hear. Then make a point to take action and openly communicate that action and results to your staff. Just don't push this under the rug. And don't let your employees feel invisible. That's a sure-fire way to kill engagement and create the kind of service culture that loses both employees and constituents.
Subscribe to receive posts via email:
Get answers to product questions, join "Birds of a Feather" discussions and more. Join the Online Community
Alltop - Nonprofit
Beaconfirewire
Beth's Blog
Donor Power Blog
Everyday Giving
Future Leaders in Philanthropy
Frogloop
Getting Attention
Global Voices
Katya's Nonprofit Marketing Blog
Nonprofit Law Prof
NTEN
Sea Change Strategies
Social Actions
Tactical Philanthropy
The Agitator
Walkathon Guide
Zen and the Art of Nonprofit Technology
URL: http://tacticalphilanthropy.com/2008/06/invest-in-the-best-to-make-an-impact
Sean Stannard-Stockton had a great article about investing in the best in Financial Times. He also blogs about it on his Tactical Philanthropy blog. There is a great deal that plays into staff engagement, but Sean does a nice job of speaking to the "business case." http://tacticalphilanthropy.com/2008/06/invest-in-the-best-to-make-an-impact
URL:
Thanks, Larry. Your comment sparks an interesting question: what is acceptable turnover? In the non-profit sector - where career mobility within an organization can be somewhat static - turnover can be crippling but it's understandable if there's little room to move and grow as a professional. One person leaving to take on more responsibility or new challenges at another org is one thing...two, three, or more leaving because they feel dissatisfied with the work environment points to a cultural issue. If that's considered just another business cost, then that might just be gross mismanagement at play.
URL: http://www.workforceperformancegroup.com
In my work with non-profits around leadership issues I find that while everyone is very proud of the service they provide, when staff start talking about their relationships with each other, the discussion is often not very pretty. Turnover is too often accepted as a cost of doing business. So just like they have plans and goals to enable their clients to be successful, it would make sense that staff have a "treatment plan" to enable collaborative staff success. Larry Wenger
URL: http://www.alchemyofsoulfulwork.com
That is brilliant. It's those simple questions that cut right to the heart of things, isn't it? And in the non-profit world where everyone typically wears many hats and works for pay that can be lower than in other industries, providing a clear way for each employee to bring their best selves each day is vital. It's something that can't be ignored or sacrificed to attitudes of busyness and hyperproductivity. Each ED and CEO should ask themselves why their employees work for their organization and would they sprint out the door if another job opportunity fell in their lap. Thanks for getting the dialogue started, Patti!
URL: http://www.37days.com
Great post. This kind of outward-focus is so prevalent - spending more time and energy on external stakeholders than on internal ones. Don't we also sometimes do that with our own families, too? When the Americans with Disabilities (ADA) act passed, I was very active in the disability community on a national level - a friend outside that sphere made the brilliantly naive comment: "Wouldn't it make sense for EVERY employer to ask EVERY employee what 'reasonable accommodation' they need to do their best work?" Thanks for this food for thought.