|
Presidential Online Scorecard: Accessibility |
In light of Misty McLaughlin's post Presidential Hopefuls Scorecard, and with AIR Austin creeping up on the horizon, I thought I would take a few minutes to briefly review the accessibility of the sites of Barack Obama and John McCain. (This will be based as much as it can be unbiasedly on accessibility - wish me luck!)
Barack Obama
Pros
- Graceful resizing for anyone who needs larger fonts.
- Commendable job separating content from design. Turn off the style sheets on this site and you end up with a decent job of pure content, and *gasp* skip links to jump over the navigation.
- Tabbing is fairly intuitive (for all of our mouse-free users out there) and seems to allow you to navigate through the site almost as if you were using a mouse.
- Closed captioned multimedia options - which means everyone has access to the content in the speeches.
Cons
- The contrast of the links to the background in some places is no where near distinct enough and could cause problems for people with visual impairments or old monitors.
- There are quite a few images with no alt tags (not even blank ones), and that can mean big trouble if you're a screen reader user.
- A couple of bad moves when it comes to the use of headers, using them for style instead of substance
John McCain
Pros
- Graceful resizing for anyone who needs larger fonts.
- Again, tabbing is fairly intuitive making it at least mostly able to be navigated by keyboard-only users.
Cons
- No closed captioning or alternative accessible features for multimedia. (The only option is a PDF brief of the speech.)
- Mediocre separation of content and design - in most parts tables are used to control positioning, which means trouble for a lot of people.
- Some links open in new windows with no indication - which completely disables the back button and hindering backwards navigation to the rest of the site.
- Absolutely no headers used on the site as far as I can tell - which means no indication of information heirarchy and challenging navigation for screenreader users
The Results
I wanted to give you an even list of pros and cons on both sites, but the drama wasn't there, gang. Kudos to Barack Obama's team for taking them time to include accessibility (and web) best practices into the website. McCain clearly has a lot to learn about the web as a medium and about the millions of people in America and around the world who have disabilities that impair the way that they use the access information on the internet.
This is a big pass to Barack Obama with flying colors, making the score 1-0.
PS - Side note - Convio is proud to announce that we will have TWO teams competing in the AIR Austin competition in October. Good luck teams - we'll be sure to post the results as they come in! Learn more about AIR Austin by checking out the Knowbility website.
Subscriptions
Subscribe to the RSS feed
Subscribe to receive posts via email:
Convio Clients
Get answers to product questions, submit and rate product ideas, join "Birds of a Feather" discussions, and more. Join the Online Community
Videos
Photos
Categories
Blogs We're Following
Bailey WorkPlay
Beaconfirewire
Beth's Blog
Betsy's Blog
Blogger Relations
Donor Power Blog
Echo Ditto
ePolitics
Future Leaders in Philanthropy
Frogloop
Getting Attention
Give and Take
Global Voices
Katya's Nonprofit Marketing Blog
Logos Institute Blog
Mom at Home
Nonprofit Success
NTEN
OrgMarketing.com
Sea Change Strategies
Seth's Blog
Sue's Muse
Tactical Philanthropy
The Agitator
The Integrator
Wayne Pacelle - A Humane Nation
Zen and the Art of Nonprofit Technology
Archives
URL: http://www.connectioncafe.com
Hey Mike! Thanks for the heads up on the link- should be fixed now. This has definitely been a fun process, and there are lots of opportunities to make comparisons. We'll definitely be looking for other ways to integrate this concept in moving forward, so you may get just that.
URL: http://openconcept.ca
The Knowability link was busted, but this is an interesting way to rate a campaign site. Would be interested in getting your feedback on Canada's main federal parties.